Readable inputs
Keyword evidence stays visible beside every classification, so agents know why a ticket moved.
Evaluation sheet / build 0.8.4
Model labels incoming tickets, estimates urgency, and drafts a next action. This evaluation build runs entirely in your browser with deterministic keyword rules—no account, API key, or network request.
Run evaluation ↓Interactive evaluation
Runs locally with bundled keyword rules. No API calls, no data storage.
chargechargedrefundpaymentVerify the payment ledger, identify any duplicate transaction, and route to Billing Ops.
“Thanks for flagging this. We classified your request as billing with high urgency. Our next step is to verify the payment ledger, identify any duplicate transaction, and route to Billing Ops. We’ll keep you updated as we review it.”
Method notes
Keyword evidence stays visible beside every classification, so agents know why a ticket moved.
Scores support review thresholds. They are never presented as certainty or hidden behind a magic label.
Drafts accelerate the first response. Your team keeps final authority over routing and customer communication.
Review questions
No. Classification runs in your browser using bundled keyword rules. No ticket text leaves the page.
No. It is a transparent product demo designed to show the workflow and interface with deterministic output.
A production implementation could connect to your help desk, knowledge base, routing policies, and review queue.
Yes. Human review and correction should remain part of any production support workflow.
Join the pilot list for production integrations, review controls, and evaluation tooling.
Request early access ↗